Path: utzoo!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!rpi!pawl13.pawl.rpi.edu!kudla
From: kudla@pawl.rpi.edu (Robert J. Kudla)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: what is wrong with CBM?
Message-ID: <1313@rpi.edu>
Date: 16 Apr 89 19:54:02 GMT
References: <551@corpane.UUCP> <42ab6bca.1285f@maize.engin.umich.edu>
Sender: usenet@rpi.edu
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY
Lines: 16

In article <42ab6bca.1285f@maize.engin.umich.edu> beh@caen.engin.umich.edu (Bob Hruska) writes:
>One thing I did notice about the 1084S is that it can't use NEARLY as many
>rows/columns with MoreRows.
>My roommates 1084S doesn't even quite fit my CLI on it.  Is this a sign of
>the monitor being 'cheaper'?

Well, I have a 1084 and let's see how many extra rows I'm getting....
My MoreRows is set to rows=+32, Columns=+64. I think your friend may have
overlooked the little knobs in the back marked "horizontal size" and
"vertical size" or whatever (I've never actually seen them; I just reach
behind and twiddle 'em :) ).

Robert Jude Kudla "Disclaimers are for wimps"       userfw3s@rpitsmts.BITNET
\      //  Funk Bass: anything else is just grody.        kudla@pawl.rpi.edu
 \    //                                     "I believe in watching you...."
/ \ \X/  Keywords: Oldfield Yes U2 REM Zeppelin F.G.T.H.  .....and even Rush