Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!pasteur!ames!elroy!gryphon!keithd
From: keithd@gryphon.COM (Keith Doyle)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: what is wrong with CBM?
Message-ID: <14975@gryphon.COM>
Date: 22 Apr 89 02:01:29 GMT
References: <551@corpane.UUCP> <42ab6bca.1285f@maize.engin.umich.edu>
Reply-To: keithd@gryphon.COM (Keith Doyle)
Organization: Trailing Edge Technology, Redondo Beach, CA
Lines: 21

In article <111400036@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> jrw10536@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu writes:
>Could someone please tell my why they stopped selling the 1080 monitor and
>switched to the 1084 and the 1084S?

Dain bramage I'd guess.

>  I have a 1080 which has a nice picture,
>except for the little jaggies at eh right edge of the screen sometimes.

That's because you've got your contrast and/or brightness cranked up too high.
the 1084 will do that too under those conditions.  They do not all do it to
the same degree.

>My friend has a 1084.  Sure, he has more little nobs to turn, but his screen
>is not glare reduced like the 1080.

I agree, I hate shiny tube monitors.  All I can see is the lights in
the room.

Keith Doyle
keithd@gryphon.COM    gryphon!keithd     gryphon!keithd@elroy.jpl.nasa.gov