Path: utzoo!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!apple!oliveb!amiga!jimm
From: jimm@amiga.UUCP (Jim Mackraz)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: RastPort structure definition
Message-ID: <3754@amiga.UUCP>
Date: 18 Apr 89 20:26:49 GMT
References: <963@psueea.UUCP>
Reply-To: jimm@cloyd.UUCP (Jim Mackraz)
Organization: Commodore-Amiga Inc, Los Gatos CA
Lines: 20

In article <963@psueea.UUCP> bartonr@psu-cs.cs.pdx.edu (Robert Barton) writes:
)From rastport.h :                      From rastport.i :
)struct RastPort                        STRUCTURE  RastPort,0
){
	...					...
)    BYTE    linpatcnt;                   BYTE     rp_Dummy
)    BYTE    dummy;                       BYTE     rp_linpatcnt
)
)  Note the reversal of linpatcnt and dummy.  Anyone know which is correct?

The one on the left is correct.  I believe that neither of these fields
are suitable for direct manipulation or examination, so I hope this answer
doesn't matter to you.

	jimm
-- 
Jim Mackraz, I and I Computing	   	"He's hidden now, but you can see
{cbmvax,well,oliveb}!amiga!jimm          The bubbles where he breathes."
							- Shriekback
Opinions are my own.  Comments are not to be taken as Commodore official policy.