Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!TMASL.EXXON.COM!FERGUSON From: FERGUSON@TMASL.EXXON.COM Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo Subject: HP Buyout Message-ID: <8904150151.AA22818@umix.cc.umich.edu> Date: 14 Apr 89 19:35:00 GMT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 46 I just had my Dad read me the Wall Street Journal's coverage of the takeover. Thomas Vanderslice said something to the effect that Apollo is excited about this whole deal. The HP spokespeople said that 'a wave of happiness will spread over the installed base of Apollo users'. Supposedly this is a good thing for all of us. I talked with my Apollo sales team (they're convincing me to buy a DN10000), and they gave me the full positive reply. Here's a couple things they mentioned to me: 1) Combining Apollo and HP's installed base and production, they have become the world's largest workstation vendor. 2) The combination gives Apollo a whole lot more buckaroos for R&D, which can't be a bad thing. 3) HP Bought Apollo BECAUSE of the existing installed base of Apollos, and because of the superior products Apollo has created. They're not just going to sink them, but use them to get an edge on the other guys. I do like the idea of the extended research budget, but that could turn into wishful thinking if they're not careful. What scares me is that these takeovers/mergers tend to completely disorganize a corporation, ruining customer support AND innovation. Will HP go and replace half of Apollo's top management with HP people, leaving a huge sales/support force angry and un-promoted? I've done my share of yelling across the net about Apollo's business types, but at least they know their own company. I'd rather yell at familiar Apollo businesspeople than unfamiliar HP ones. I guess a lot of good could come out of this, but so could a lot of greed and cost-cutting for the sake of a nice profit figure. Let's hope they do this right. Scott Ferguson ferguson@erevax.bitnet ...the views expressed here in no way reflect those of Exxon Research and Engineering Co.