Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!purdue!decwrl!wam.UMD.EDU!russotto From: russotto@wam.UMD.EDU Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: BIG loophole allows piracy... Message-ID: <8904210008.AA02400@vs03csc.UMD.EDU> Date: 21 Apr 89 00:08:32 GMT References: <6408@bsu-cs.UUCP> <113300058@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> Organization: University of Maryland, College Park Lines: 33 In article <113300058@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu> trd10523@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu writes: > >I personally don't think they should close the loophole. After all, each >computer is not buying the program - the school is. It's not practical for >the school to pay hundreds of dollars TIMES the number of computer they own. >This fact is keeping the cost of tuition high and the number of computers low. >If the school (or other institution) has that large of a software budget, >I'd rather see them buy more different programs than pay repeatedly for one. > >(And yes, I know I'm going to get flak from those on the other side of the >fence - mainly, the members of the software industry. I know that authors >should be paid for their work, and I wholeheartedly agree, but I don't think >any one consumer should pay for a program more than once.) > >Todd Davis >Student, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign >trd10523@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu >Disclaimer: They're my ideas, not UIUC's. We welcome replies to this editorial. You overstate your case. Schools can, (and should, in my opinion as a programmer), buy a site license, which costs significantly less than price*number of machines. By your logic, GTE could buy one copy of a software program, and the ENTIRE ORGANIZATION could use it for the same as the individual price. Software is generally sold per simultaneously running copy-- If I buy a program, I can generally use it on any number of different machines, but only one at a time. -- DISCLAIMER: Not only does the University not share my opinions, they don't want me sharing my opinions. "This 'Pnews', what does it do?" Matthew T. Russotto russotto@wam.umd.edu