Path: utzoo!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!rutgers!att!oucsace!thollowe
From: thollowe@oucsace.cs.OHIOU.EDU (Tom Hollowell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Logitech Mice
Summary: latest develpoopment
Message-ID: <531@oucsace.cs.OHIOU.EDU>
Date: 17 Apr 89 23:08:28 GMT
References: <3294@homxb.ATT.COM> <788@sunset.MATH.UCLA.EDU> <522@oucsace.cs.OHIOU.EDU>
Organization: Ohio University CS Dept., Athens
Lines: 17

In article <522@oucsace.cs.OHIOU.EDU>, thollowe@oucsace.cs.OHIOU.EDU (Tom Hollowell) writes:
> In article <788@sunset.MATH.UCLA.EDU>, tony@julia.math.ucla.edu (Tony Lei) writes:
> > I'm the one that posted the ad for Robert Filipian, an alumni here at
> > UCLA.  I guess he flaked by not sending out the mice but here is his
> > phone number again for all of you who had problems with this guy: 
> > 
> I ordered from him, and I'll admit it took a while to get the mouse, but I
> finally have it, and now if I can find the time, I will install it and see
> how it works.  There is zero documentation with it.  But I can't complain
> for the price I paid.
> 

Now I can sort of complain.  I received the mouse, along with my check, un-
cashed.  The mouse does not work, it does not move the pointer around the 
screen, but the buttons work.  He obviously knew these things were defective,
but what was the point of sending the mouse at all, why not just return the
check.  Anybody get one that worked?