Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!husc6!bbn!apple!well!svc From: svc@well.UUCP (Leonard Rosenthol) Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac Subject: Re: Xmodem uploads using MicroSoft Works ( Troubles ) Summary: Are you sure about that?? Keywords: Xmodem Works Mac Message-ID: <11333@well.UUCP> Date: 16 Apr 89 20:40:05 GMT References: <1402@mimir.dmt.oz> <6777@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> Lines: 46 In article <6777@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>, mithomas@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Michael Thomas Niehaus) writes: > In article <1402@mimir.dmt.oz>, paz@mimir.dmt.oz (Paul Zemancheff) writes: > > > > [Problems with MSWorks and XMODEM] > > > > I have had this same type of problem with Microsoft Works, Mac240, and a > copy of Zterm (0.75) when trying to upload using Xmodem to a UNIX host. > Downloading works fine with all applications, but uploading locks up after > the first characters on all of them. > Are you uploading MacBinary formated files or text files? If the former did you remember to tell the host that (ie. something like xmodem -sb for send binary!)? If you tried to send a binary file to a host exepecting a text file, the host could get hosed because the binary data could contain some ctrl-chars (and other stuff) that it might not like as text. Check that and see if that had anything to do with it. > I have been told that this could have something to do with flow control. > Apparently, the Mac can send data faster than the host can receive so the > host sends out a control-s (binary equiv, of course) from hardware, > causing a lockup in the protocol. I don't know if this is true, but in our > case here at Ball State it is a valid argument not because the host sends > out the control-s, but because our wonderful (&*&%*) AT&T ISN network does > its own flow control unless the system administrator explicitly disables it > port by port. Of course, he would not do this for just anyone (especially not > a student...) > We were sitting aroudn the office lately discussing a similar topic and it seemed to us that a host SHOULD NOT be sending an XOFF (Ctrl-S) in the MIDDLE of a XMODEM/YMODEM transfer! Since the host has to waitfor/send the ACK/NAK to let the other side know about the status of the transfer, the slower side could simply hold off sending/responding until it is good and ready! It is conceivable that during a YMODEM-G transfer where not other flow control is used (non-error correcting protocol) that XOFFs could be sent to slow down the transfer (or other forms of flow control) but not during an XMODEM/YMODEM tranfer. Seems to me that there is some other problem. I have been doing UNIX up and downloads for a while now and have never had any problems with X/Y or Z MODEM.; -- +--------------------------------------------------+ Leonard Rosenthol | GEnie : MACgician Lazerware, inc. | MacNet: MACgician UUCP: svc@well.UUCP | ALink : D0025