Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-winken!uunet!cs.dal.ca!aucs!880716a
From: 880716a@aucs.UUCP (Dave Astels)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: Lisp on the Next
Message-ID: <1841@aucs.UUCP>
Date: 20 Apr 89 15:46:17 GMT
References: <4761@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: 880716a@aucs.UUCP (Dave Astels)
Organization: School of Computer Science, Acadia Univ., Nova Scotia
Lines: 18

In article <4761@pt.cs.cmu.edu> jwz@spice.cs.cmu.edu (Jamie Zawinski) writes:
>
>that one could implement Flavors/CLOS/whatever in such a way that classes
>defined in C looked (programatically) pretty much the same as classes
>defined in Lisp.


That would be the way to go.  Sort of like Mac toolbox access.  Otherwise
you aren't any furthur ahead that running under vanilla UNIX.  You should be
able to access all the NeXTStep goodies and the Kits as well.  GNU EMACS Lisp
isn't the way to go, as far as I can see.  There should be a LISP/CLOS 
developement  environment that features all this as well as both interpretor
and a true compiler that will create programs that can be launched from the
WorkBench.

(my terminology may be off as I am not too familiar with NeXT yet.)

-Dave