Xref: utzoo comp.sys.tandy:1272 comp.unix.xenix:5710
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!decwrl!labrea!eos!ames!sun-arpa!male!pitstop!texsun!letni!sneaky!gordon
From: gordon@sneaky.UUCP (Gordon Burditt)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.tandy,comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: Tandy 16/6000 Xenix 3.2 'cc' problems
Summary: Use -+ option with 3.2 development system
Keywords: tandy 16 6000 Xenix 3.2 cc
Message-ID: <9899@sneaky.UUCP>
Date: 21 Apr 89 04:02:59 GMT
References: <516@coyote.UUCP>
Reply-To: gordon@sneaky.UUCP (Gordon Burditt)
Followup-To: comp.sys.tandy
Organization: Gordon Burditt
Lines: 23

>It seems that in tandys latest development system that "cc" only
>supports 8 significant characters. The assembler on the other hand
>supports 31(?) or so. This leads to large problems in porting software

Using the 3.2.0 development system upgrade with the 3.0.0 development
system:

	cc -+ -o foo foo.c

gives 32-character significant preprocessor symbols, and 31-plus-underscore
significant external names.  With or without the -+ option, which isn't
passed to them anyway, the assembler and linker still support 50 characters 
maximum (as distinguished from 50 characters significant).

(Don't confuse the version number of the "Xenix Multiuser Operating System"
with the version number of the "Xenix Development System", even though
they both have a 3.2).

					Gordon L. Burditt
					...!texbell!sneaky!gordon

Disclaimer:  The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily
those of any organization, living or dead.