Path: utzoo!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!pacbell!sactoh0!smcroft
From: smcroft@sactoh0.UUCP (Steve M. Croft)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.xenix
Subject: Re: AT VS 3B1
Summary: 3B1 a 32-bitter ??!?!
Message-ID: <871@sactoh0.UUCP>
Date: 17 Apr 89 08:03:25 GMT
References: <670@ultb.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: Sacramento Public Access, Ca. USA
Lines: 14

In article <670@ultb.UUCP>, thw9759@ultb.UUCP (T.H. White) writes:
> 
> Which is better, an AT&T 3B1 or a PC/AT clone?
> 
> - a 3B1 is a real 32 bit machine has demand paging capability

The 3B1 contains a 68010 which has a 16-bit data bus...  thought I'd
mention that in case anyone thought the 3B1 was a full 32-bit machine...

-- 
###############################################################
#                 steve "whadda guy" croft                    #  
# ...!pacbell!sactoh0!smcroft  ||  ...csusac!athena!crofts    #
###############################################################