Path: utzoo!utgpu!watmath!uunet!lll-winken!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!uxc!garcon!garcon.cso.uiuc.edu!grunwald From: grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu Newsgroups: gnu.gcc Subject: Re: FORTRAN Dhrystone for i860? [NO Message-ID: Date: 6 Apr 89 05:17:05 GMT References: <15347@winchester.mips.COM> <46500054@uxe.cso.uiuc.edu> <4926@xyzzy.UUCP> Sender: news@garcon.cso.uiuc.edu Organization: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Lines: 21 In-reply-to: meissner@dg-rtp.dg.com's message of 5 Apr 89 20:08:43 GMT In article <4926@xyzzy.UUCP> meissner@dg-rtp.dg.com (Michael Meissner) writes: ... I've been meaning to post for sometime, about my experiences with GNU and dhrystone. For our 88k machines, Data General decided to go with the GNU compiler for it's default compiler, for various reasons, instead of using Greenhills. Anyway, when the GNU compiler was .... Michael Meissner, Data General. Well, I think this is very interesting. Not only is NeXT using the Gnu C compiler, now Data General is using it as the ``generic'' compiler. We're using it on a '386 system, and now the vendor is interested is using it instead of Greenhills (surprisingly, Gnu C is more stable than the '386 version of Greenhills that we have). Must be doing something right. -- Dirk Grunwald Univ. of Illinois grunwald@flute.cs.uiuc.edu