Path: utzoo!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!lll-winken!tekbspa!optilink!cramer
From: cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: Freedom of hate
Message-ID: <1219@optilink.UUCP>
Date: 16 Apr 89 19:11:28 GMT
References: <14636@gryphon.COM# <1208@optilink.UUCP# <1989Apr14.183516.27708@utpsych.toronto.edu#
Distribution: na
Organization: Optilink Corporation, Petaluma, CA
Lines: 28

In article <1989Apr14.183516.27708@utpsych.toronto.edu#, raymond@utpsych.toronto.edu (Raymond Shaw) writes:
# In article <1208@optilink.UUCP# cramer@optilink.UUCP (Clayton Cramer) writes:
# #In article <14636@gryphon.COM#, richard@gryphon.COM (Richard Sexton) writes:
# ## So by this reasoning, any student at a State run university should
# ## be able to get anything published in the state run university 
# ## supported school newspaper, and if they can't it's censorship ?
# #
# #Absolutely. 
# 
# Absolutely not.  It's called editorial policy.  Editors decide what is
# published in a newspaper, not the university.  
# 
# If the university administration decides, then that is censorship;
# if it is a government owned university, then that is gov't censorship.
# 
# -Ray Shaw

But someone who works for the university administration (the editor)
decides, and it isn't censorship?  No, as long as a government agency
or its employees decides what goes in, and what doesn't, it's censor-
ship.


-- 
Clayton E. Cramer                   {pyramid,pixar,tekbspa}!optilink!cramer
Governments that don't trust most people with weapons, deserve no trust.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer?  You must be kidding!  No company would hold opinions like mine!