Path: utzoo!dptcdc!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!ukc!tcdcs!tcdmath!dbell
From: dbell@maths.tcd.ie (Derek Bell)
Newsgroups: news.misc
Subject: Re: Freedom of hate
Message-ID: <755@maths.tcd.ie>
Date: 17 Apr 89 16:48:10 GMT
References: <14130@gryphon.COM< <8132@chinet.chi.il.us< <1216@frog.UUCP< <8200@chinet.chi.il.us<
Reply-To: dbell@maths.tcd.ie (Derek Bell)
Organization: Maths Dept., Trinity College, Dublin
Lines: 18

In article <8200@chinet.chi.il.us< patrick@chinet.chi.il.us (Patrick A. Townson) writes:
<And you come back, not with examples of where the ACLU did in fact agree
<that speech under some circumstances is illegal, but instead, talking about
<my understanding of the constitution! As a matter of fact, I can think of
<a few examples of 'illegal speech'; speech which receives no constitutional
<protection -- but I am sure the ACLU would disagree with me on that point.

		Ok, what _do_ you consider as an example of illegal speech?

<-- 
<Patrick Townson 


-- 
**********************	'It reads: The Grail is in Castle AARRGH!'
* dbell@maths.tcd.ie *  'Oooooohhhhhhh!'
* belld@vax1.tcd.ie  *  'No, it definitely says AARRGH!...'
**********************		Monty Python & the Holy Grail