Path: utzoo!yunexus!landolt
From: landolt@yunexus.UUCP (Paul Landolt)
Newsgroups: ont.general
Subject: Re: Highway Driving Rules
Message-ID: <1730@yunexus.UUCP>
Date: 28 Apr 89 14:14:13 GMT
Article-I.D.: yunexus.1730
References: <89Apr26.134028edt.9320@ois.db.toronto.edu> <440@bnr-fos.UUCP> <1989Apr27.112604.11727@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca>
Reply-To: landolt@yunexus.UUCP (Paul Landolt)
Distribution: ont
Organization: York U. Computing Services
Lines: 26

In article <1989Apr27.112604.11727@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca> adam@gpu.utcs.UUCP (Adam R. Iles) writes:
>In article <440@bnr-fos.UUCP> schow@bnr-public.UUCP (Stanley Chow) writes:
>
>>To summarise, low speed limit does not reduce accidents. Even it does, people
>>should be allowed to *choose* to live dangerously.
>
>But should they be able to live dangerously around ME?  If you want to kill
>yourself that's one thing, but if you want to kill me that's another.
>
If you are afraid of people living dangerously, as other people may be
(afraid, that is), then it would be in your best interests, as well as
those who wish to travel at a faster rate, to stay in the 'correct' lane.
weavers weavetend to weave to get around people who believe it is their
God-given right to proceed along in the left hand lane at 100kph.

People doing the limit should stay to the right. Common sense. If you are
going slower than people around you, then procede to the rightmost lane
where you are travelling at a rate suitable for the lane.

This really shouldn't be such a hard rule of thumb.  It could save a lot
of problems if people kept it in mind every once in a while.
-- 
Really:   J. Paul Landolt        | Some of us are born unto greatness,
INTERNET: LANDOLT@Nexus.YorkU.CA | Others see no problem with swiping it!

"The opinions expressed are mine. Don't blame the boss. She only hired me"