Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bgsuvax!klopfens
From: klopfens@bgsuvax.UUCP (Bruce Klopfenstein)
Newsgroups: sci.electronics
Subject: Re: Stereo vs. Mono: Q about AM Stereo
Summary: An excellent suggestion!  Thank you!
Message-ID: <4062@bgsuvax.UUCP>
Date: 26 Apr 89 16:07:30 GMT
References: <4046@bgsuvax.UUCP> <17582@cup.portal.com>
Distribution: na
Organization: Bowling Green State University B.G., Oh.
Lines: 20

In article <17582@cup.portal.com>, ISW@cup.portal.com (Isaac S Wingfield) writes:
> to mono, consider that essentially all recorded musical
> material these days is recorded in stereo, and is intended to
> be reproduced in stereo; there are fewer mono setups than ever,
> and so less motivation for the recording engineers to make the
> special compromises needed for adequate mono repeoduction. By
> 
This is an excellent suggestion.  For those of you who haven't had
the "pleasure" of trying to get an academic article accepted for
publication in a "scholarly" journal, anonymous reviewers (some
quite pompous and condescending) ask for revisions to your original
article so you can "join the club" of publishing scholars.  I suspect
that some of these reviewers had bad experiences in their pasts, and want to share their misery!


-- 
Dr. Bruce C. Klopfenstein      |  klopfens@andy.bgsu.edu
Radio-TV-Film Department       |  klopfenstein@bgsuopie.bitnet
Bowling Green $tate University |  klopfens@bgsuvax.UUCP
Bowling Green, OH  43403       |  (419) 372-2138; 352-4818