Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!bingvaxu!sunybcs!rutgers!att!cbnews!eos!eugene@eos.arc.nasa.gov
From: eos!eugene@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Eugene Miya)
Newsgroups: sci.military
Subject: Re: Sparrow miss rate off Libya (tit for tat)
Message-ID: <5797@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 21 Apr 89 03:28:58 GMT
References: <5735@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Sender: military@cbnews.ATT.COM
Organization: NASA Ames Research Center, Calif.
Lines: 19
Approved: military@att.att.com



From: eos!eugene@eos.arc.nasa.gov (Eugene Miya)

It totally amazes me that sci.military dwells so long on such a minor point.
You should discuss means of evasion of Atolls, or other Soviet missiles
to understand why Sparrows miss so often.  It will being like being a Soviet
(or maybe Libyan) pilot wondering about your chances.

Longish signature follows "Type 'n' now"

Another gross generalization from

--eugene miya, NASA Ames Research Center, eugene@aurora.arc.nasa.gov
  resident cynic at the Rock of Ages Home for Retired Hackers:
  "You trust the `reply' command with all those different mailers out there?"
  "If my mail does not reach you, please accept my apology."
  {ncar,decwrl,hplabs,uunet}!ames!eugene
  				Live free or die.