Path: utzoo!yunexus!maccs!lsuc!tmsoft!mason
From: mason@tmsoft.uucp (Dave Mason)
Newsgroups: tor.news
Subject: Re: Munged article in tor.news.stats
Message-ID: <1989Apr20.051246.23373@tmsoft.uucp>
Date: 20 Apr 89 05:12:46 GMT
Article-I.D.: tmsoft.1989Apr20.051246.23373
References: <1989Apr18.063300.2852@tmszfI.uucp> <1660@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> <1989Apr19.052915.6467@utzoo.uucp>
Reply-To: mason@tmsoft.UUCP (Dave Mason)
Followup-To: tor.news
Organization: TM Software Associates, Toronto
Lines: 13

In article <1989Apr19.052915.6467@utzoo.uucp> henry@utzoo.uucp (Henry Spencer) writes:
>In article <1660@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> tim@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca (Tim Pointing) writes:
>>... If the problem didn't happen
>>during transmission, how did utzoo have the right line count (or does that
>>number just stay with the file, regardles of what the file actually look like)?
>
>The number just stays with the file; it's put in by the originator.
>(C News does not even deign to notice it, as we consider it useless.)

Actually it was put in by dptcdc.  We also run Cnews, so of course don't
have any truck with this `Lines:' header nonsense, either! :-)

	../Dave