Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!lll-winken!uunet!ficc!karl
From: karl@ficc.uu.net (karl lehenbauer)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Voting period concluded for comp.realtime
Message-ID: <4128@ficc.uu.net>
Date: 9 May 89 23:06:46 GMT
References: <3954@ficc.uu.net> <76700066@p.cs.uiuc.edu>
Organization: Ferranti International Controls
Lines: 19

In article <76700066@p.cs.uiuc.edu>, gillies@p.cs.uiuc.edu writes:
> I want to restate my view:  I think this is a bad idea.  And I work on
>   scheduling for real-time systems.

Noted.  Again.

> According to the above criteria, you have no good reason to create the
> new discussion group.  If there really is a high level of interest,
> why don't we see heavy discussion about real systems in comp.os.research,
> comp.theory, or other newsgroups?

You've said this in postings twice now, plus twice in email, plus you voted
twice.

The 170 people who voted *for* the group seemed to think it was a good idea.
Come check in on us in a few weeks and see how we're doing.
-- 
-- uunet!ficc!karl	"Contemptuous lights flashed across the computer's
-- karl@ficc.uu.net	 console."  -- Hitchhiker's Guide