Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!njin!princeton!notecnirp!nr
From: nr@notecnirp.Princeton.EDU (Norman Ramsey)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Rush priority for cbip
Message-ID: <16808@princeton.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 4 May 89 16:30:20 GMT
Sender: news@princeton.Princeton.EDU
Reply-To: nr@princeton.Princeton.EDU (Norman Ramsey)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Princeton University
Lines: 15


I highly value the testing that Rahul does and the moderator's
comments he attaches to the posting.  If I know something's coming and
I need it in a real hurry, I can always send a floppy disk to the
author [along with a self-addressed, prepaid Express Mail envelope :-)].
I assume that something posted in the ``rush'' category would not be
evaluated and tested later (why post it twice?).  In this case
I would never use anything in the rush category, so it would reduce
the amount of software I use.

Rahul's doing a difficult job well.  Why fix it if it's not broken?


Norman Ramsey
nr@princeton.edu