Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!hc!lll-winken!uunet!wucs1!wugate!wupost!kuhub.cc.ukans.edu!sloane
From: sloane@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu (Bob Sloane)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: How does a RUSH category sound?
Message-ID: <6722@kuhub.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: 5 May 89 16:15:37 GMT
References: <7090@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>
Organization: University of Kansas Academic Computing Services
Lines: 17

In article <7090@bsu-cs.bsu.edu>, dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
> How does a RUSH category sound for comp.binaries.ibm.pc?  If an
> incoming submission is marked RUSH in the subject heading,
> [description of how RUSH would be handled deleted}

I, for one, would not like to see this done.  I suspect that most of
the submissions would be marked RUSH, which would defeat the purpose
of marking them RUSH.  I have been very happy with the way things have
been going on c.b.i.p so far, and I don't see any need for a change.
If it takes a few weeks more to get the programs, so what. I managed
to survive this long without them.  If you can't live without the
latest version of NetHack or whatever, get it from a bulletin board.
+-------------------+-------------------------------------+------------------+
|  Bob Sloane        \Internet: SLOANE@KUHUB.CC.UKANS.EDU/Anything I said is |
|  Computer Center    \ BITNET: SLOANE@UKANVAX.BITNET   / my opinion, not my |
|  University of Kansas\  AT&T: (913) 864-0444         /  employer's.        |
+-----------------------+-----------------------------+----------------------+