Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!gatech!mcdchg!clyde!feg
From: feg@clyde.ATT.COM (Forrest Gehrke)
Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d
Subject: Re: How does a RUSH category sound?
Message-ID: <45859@clyde.ATT.COM>
Date: 5 May 89 11:33:36 GMT
References: <7090@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> <3156@epimass.EPI.COM>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Whippany NJ
Lines: 20

In article <3156@epimass.EPI.COM>, jbuck@epimass.EPI.COM (Joe Buck) writes:
.> In article <7090@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Rahul Dhesi) writes:
.> >How does a RUSH category sound for comp.binaries.ibm.pc?  If an
.> >incoming submission is marked RUSH in the subject heading,
.> >
.> Given that it costs to send all this drivel around, the least we can
.> do is make sure it's quality drivel. :-)  That means testing, archiving,
.> etc.
.> 

Hear, hear!

.> Now it may well be that circumstances exist that justify "rush" handling.
.> I'd prefer to see someone else's judgment than the poster used to decide
.> this (like the moderator's, perhaps).
.> 
Amen--go thou in peace, Rahul.  Leave it alone.  Those that are in
such a rush can hook up with their neighborhood BBS.

Forrest Gehrke