Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!psuvax1!vu-vlsi!cgh!paul From: paul@cgh.UUCP (Paul Homchick) Newsgroups: comp.binaries.ibm.pc.d Subject: Re: How does a RUSH category sound? Message-ID: <776@cgh.UUCP> Date: 6 May 89 14:07:31 GMT References: <7090@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> Reply-To: paul@cgh.UUCP (Paul Homchick) Organization: Chimitt Gilman Homchick, Radnor, PA Lines: 16 In article <7090@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> dhesi@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Rahul Dhesi) writes: >How does a RUSH category sound for comp.binaries.ibm.pc? If an >Comments? >Rahul Dhesi There are some perfectly good reasons for moderating this group. Adding a RUSH option circumvents the moderation and would subject all of us to the problems that caused us to set up moderation in the first place. No to RUSH. Yes to moderation. "Moderation in posting of binaries IS a virtue." -- Paul Homchick :UUCP {rutgers | uunet} !cbmvax!cgh!paul Chimitt Gilman Homchick, Inc. :Internet cgh!paul@manta.pha.pa.us 259 Radnor-Chester Rd, Suite 140 :MCI PHOMCHICK Radnor, PA 19087-5299 :GEnie HOMCHICK