Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!att!cbnews!grs
From: grs@cbnews.ATT.COM (gregg.r.siegfried)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5
Subject: Re: ulimit -- You don't need sources! (minor correction)
Keywords: silly me
Message-ID: <6219@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Date: 3 May 89 23:45:56 GMT
References: <836@twwells.uucp> <4428@ihuxz.ATT.COM> <545@aurora.AthabascaU.CA> <8305@chinet.chi.il.us> <5627@xyzzy.UUCP> <6218@cbnews.ATT.COM>
Reply-To: grs@cbnews.ATT.COM (gregg.r.siegfried)
Distribution: usa
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories
Lines: 11

In article <6218@cbnews.ATT.COM> I write:
>ulimit, while all the non-login processes retain the 1K ulimit.  If you
                                                      ^^
Naturally, I mean 1 Meg here, rather than 1K.  Following up my own
articles is usually something I like to avoid.  There isn't often
a whole lot you can take issue with that isn't better discussed over
a beer.  But, if people can do it for a silly .signature, I can
certainly rectify a glaring semantic error. :-)

Gregg
grs@cblph.att.com