Xref: utzoo sci.lang:4398 comp.cog-eng:1049 sci.psychology:1708
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!nmtsun!jdpsy205
From: jdpsy205@nmtsun.nmt.edu (Jason Covington)
Newsgroups: sci.lang,comp.cog-eng,sci.psychology
Subject: Re: Effects of poor writing? (Long)
Summary: Spelling, grammar, typos and, TC
Message-ID: <2493@nmtsun.nmt.edu>
Date: 28 Apr 89 23:07:17 GMT
References: <39131@bbn.COM> <1982@trantor.harris-atd.com> <2947@tank.uchicago.edu> <17158@mimsy.UUCP>
Organization: New Mexico Tech, Socorro NM
Lines: 7

Hi guys,
This may be the wrong article to respond to but, it was the only article
I could remember the number to.  At any rate...
It seems a large portion of this `conversation' has turned to whether or
not scientists need to worry about what their words mean.  My question in
all of this is; Isn't that what we have Technical Communicators for?
Bye guys.