Xref: utzoo sci.lang:4442 comp.cog-eng:1077 sci.psychology:1777 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucsd!sdcsvax!trantor.harris-atd.com!melmac!chuck From: chuck@melmac.harris-atd.com (Chuck Musciano) Newsgroups: sci.lang,comp.cog-eng,sci.psychology Subject: Re: Effects of poor writing? (Long) Message-ID: <2018@trantor.harris-atd.com> Date: 4 May 89 12:44:23 GMT References: <4352@ttidca.TTI.COM> <3893@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> Sender: news@trantor.harris-atd.com Reply-To: chuck@trantor.harris-atd.com (Chuck Musciano) Organization: Advanced Technology Dept., Harris Corp., Melbourne, Fl. Lines: 27 In article <3893@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu> lee@uhccux.uhcc.hawaii.edu (Greg Lee) writes: >From article <4352@ttidca.TTI.COM>, by hollombe@ttidca.TTI.COM (The Polymath): >" In article <2000@trantor.harris-atd.com> chuck@trantor.harris-atd.com (Chuck Musciano) writes: >" >" If you think the crap and pap that even the best of TV programming >" presents can replace books, you must be pretty illiterate yourself. Film >" isn't significantly better and radio isn't even a visual medium. > >Let's try to distinguish prediction from wishful thinking, shall >we? It can happen that TV replaces books even if you don't >like that. Because the future may be horrifying won't keep >it from happening. If freedom really depends on literacy, it is >certainly an odd way of reasoning to assume that we will have >freedom and to conclude that therefore literacy must endure. PLEASE check attributions! I did not write the above. I believe "The Polymath" did. The point I was making was that freedom is dependent upon an informed populace, and that literacy is the cornerstone of the free distribution of information. If literacy disappears, I think most freedom will not be far behind. Chuck Musciano ARPA : chuck@trantor.harris-atd.com Harris Corporation Usenet: ...!uunet!x102a!trantor!chuck PO Box 37, MS 3A/1912 AT&T : (407) 727-6131 Melbourne, FL 32902 FAX : (407) 727-{5118,5227,4004}