Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!decwrl!wam.UMD.EDU!stripes
From: stripes@wam.UMD.EDU
Newsgroups: comp.lang.apl
Subject: Re: Function layout - a non-issue?
Message-ID: <8905022009.AA00196@vs07csc.UMD.EDU>
Date: 2 May 89 20:09:39 GMT
References: <1193@infbs.UUCP>
Organization: University of Maryland, College Park
Lines: 15

In article <1193@infbs.UUCP> hafer@infbs.UUCP (Udo Hafermann) writes:
>Are there any APL implementations which preserve the function source
>text as entered by the programmer, instead of just throwing all
>non-relevant white space away?  The way APL functions are reproduced in

All of the APL*PLUS\Unx systems keep it, and so does APL*PLUS II (for 386
MS-DOS boxes...   really APL*PLUS\Unx with a nice front-end, and implmenting
just about every one of thoes horrid Quad-Pokes), and APL*PLUS\Vax which is
also a port of the Un*x version.  (Of the three only one supports the Unified
keyboard 'tho).     I think APL*PLUS\Mac does also, but it's not exactly
"the worlds best APL".
-- 
           stripes@wam.umd.edu             Disclaimer:
      Josh_Osborne@Real_World,The           I no longer work for STSC, but
      "The dyslexic porgramer"              still like (most) of their stuff