Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!purdue!decwrl!decvax!ima!cfisun!lakart!dg From: dg@lakart.UUCP (David Goodenough) Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: case sensitivity Message-ID: <517@lakart.UUCP> Date: 27 Apr 89 14:07:50 GMT References: <1320@ns.network.com> Organization: Lakart Corporation, Newton, MA Lines: 49 FROm arTICle <1320@NS.NETwork.cOM>, by dDb@NS.NEtworK.Com (david dYEr-BenNET): F IN aRTIcLE <1989aPr21.194615.5344@utZoO.UuCP> heNRy@uTZoo.uuCp (henrY speNcer) WRIteS: O :iN ARTICLe <13159@dArtvax.dARtmOUTH.edu> jskuSKIN@EleAZAr.DArTMoUTh.edU (JeFFREy KUSkin) WRiteS: o :> Why is c CaSe-sEnSiTive? ... l : - :wHy Not? tHe Real qUEstiOn IS Why THiNGS shouLd bE CAsE-*iN*SenSITIVE. i :UPPercaSe aND lOweRcAsE Are DiFfeRENT iN appEaraNce anD IN eNgLISH usAge; N :WHY SHoULd THEy bE SyNonyMOus in a PRogrAMmiNg LAngUaGE? E w ..... AlSo, IN TExT ALl CaPS is OFtEn uSeD FOr S EmpHasIs, wITHout CONfuSiNG AnyBoDy AbouT wHIcH WorDs aRE meanT. PReCIsELy. ThAt's why oNe COnvEntion _is_ To uSe UpPErcAse fOr manifest CoNstaNts, AnD loWER CaSe FoR MOsT eVerythiNg else: #defINe sIzE 64 cHAR STRiNg[sIzE]; etC. eTC. EtC. ETc. > CAsiNG RUlES iN EnGlISH ArE geNERAllY FORmAL, NOT suBstAntive, AnD > THeRefORe I consIDEr caSe To Be ESsentIalLy noT SIgnIfICANT in NormaL > EngLiSh usAGE. gRANTED, THEY WoULd Have vERY lITTlE EFFeCt oN THe coMPReHeNsiBILItY oF the prINtEd mAttEr, But iN a cOMPaNiON pOStINg I'LL sHOw thaT THE rULes arE ImpoRTanT. AS RahUL dhESI POintEd OuT: ENgLiSh IS a cAsE SensitIve lANGUAge THIs cAN BE rEaD, BUT i'lL bET iT doeSN'T rEaD _QuITe_ As FaST As ENgLIsh iS A CAsE sENsItive langUaGe. (FoOd FOR tHoUgHT - ComENTs wElcOME) PERhaps _tHAt'S_ WHy We cAPitAlise fOR EmphASis - it cREATEs a TINy "Slow dOWN" ThuS DRAWING atTeNTion to The tExt We WANt To eMphASizE. -- Dg@lAKARt.UUCP - DaVID gOODenoUGh +---+ Ihs | +-+-+ ....... !harvaRD!xAIT!LAKarT!Dg +-+-+ | aka: DG%LAKARt.uucp@XAit.xEroX.coM +---+ ---------------------------------------- Now. Does that read as easily as my previous posting??? You see why case sensitivity _DOES_ make a difference.