Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!um-math!sharkey!shadooby!accuvax.nwu.edu!tank!uxc!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!unmvax!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcvax!kth!sunic!Urd!draken!d87-hho
From: d87-hho@nada.kth.se (Henrik Holmstr|m)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Another silly question
Summary: STOP!!!
Message-ID: <941@draken.nada.kth.se>
Date: 1 May 89 09:30:31 GMT
References: <pointer> <array> <reference> <access> <element> <2459@nmtsun.nmt.edu> <155@mole-end.UUCP> <157@mole-end.UUCP>
Reply-To: d87-hho@nada.kth.se (Henrik Holmstr|m)
Followup-To: /dev/null
Organization: Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Lines: 5

Do we need 28 follow-ups to a trivial question?  You know the rule, if you
see something obviously wrong or simple, don't just hit 'F'.  Wait a day
or two and see if someone else answered the question (or just mail the anwser).

	Henrik Holmstr|m