Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!Tim_CDC_Roberts
From: Tim_CDC_Roberts@cup.portal.com
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Pound sign (was Re: the Telephone Test)
Message-ID: <17931@cup.portal.com>
Date: 4 May 89 16:39:44 GMT
References: <630@marob.MASA.COM> <147@ixi.UUCP>
Distribution: na
Organization: The Portal System (TM)
Lines: 27

In <147@ixi.UUCP>, From: clive@ixi.UUCP (Clive)
>In article <630@marob.MASA.COM> daveh@marob.masa.com (Dave Hammond) writes:
>>Another person writes:
>>>but always, at the top of my routines, I:
>>>     pound include studio-h (dancers might include studio-54 :->)
...
> ... a "number" sign or a "hash" sign...is NOT repeat NOT a pound sign.
> A pound sign is what appears on a five pound note...

I believe you are mildly mistaken, Clive.  Referring to the musical sharp
symbol as "pound sign" has the same early commercial roots as referring to
the circled-A (@) as "at sign".  Your early grocers would write up:

    5# apples @ 9c  ....   $0.45

which is read "5 pounds apples at 9 cents...45 cents."  Thus, "pound" refers 
to "pounds avoirdupois" rather than "pounds sterling".

This usage has fallen into disuse, because today's cash registers ring up:

    5.03 lbs    @   0.98 / lb
    Red Delicious ..............     4.92

Tim_CDC_Roberts@cup.portal.com                | Control Data...
...!sun!portal!cup.portal.com!tim_cdc_roberts |   ...or it will control you.