Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!dogie.macc.wisc.edu!uwvax!rutgers!att!westmark!mole-end!mat
From: mat@mole-end.UUCP (Mark A Terribile)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Pound sign (was Re: the Telephone Test)
Summary: Pound vindicated, avoirdupois, not Sterling
Message-ID: <169@mole-end.UUCP>
Date: 6 May 89 06:31:33 GMT
References: <630@marob.MASA.COM> <147@ixi.UUCP>
Organization: mole-end--private system.  admin: mole-end!newtnews
Lines: 47

In article <147@ixi.UUCP>, clive@ixi.UUCP (Clive) writes:
> ...
> > ...
> >>	pound include studio-h (dancers might include studio-54 :->)
 
> The character that looks like [ # ]

> is a "number" sign or a "hash" sign. It is NOT repeat NOT a pound sign.
> A pound sign is what appears on a five pound note, and looks like:
 
 >      --
 >     /
 > ---+---
 > ---+---
 >   /
 > -------
 
> (or some more ornate version). How would you like it if I kept
> saying:
>        dollar include stood eye oh dot aitch

Sorry, Clive.  I have before me Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary, Eighth
Edition.  It is open to the section on ``Signs and Symbols.''  Under the
heading ``Business'' I find

	#  number if it precedes a number <track #3>; pounds
	   if it follows <a 5# sack of sugar>

In other words, it's pounds aviordupois, not pounds sterling.

The usage is legitimate, although perhaps we should write

	include#

and

	if#

The late Ma Bell would have liked us to call it an octothorpe--in fact, I
think in some parts of AT&T they still call it that when it appears on a
Touch-Tone (is that still a registered Service and Trade Mark?) telephone set.
I can tell you that the announcements built into some of their products
instruct the user to ``Press five, followed by the Pound Sign.''
-- 

(This man's opinions are his own.)
From mole-end				Mark Terribile