Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!itsgw!steinmetz!crdgw1!uunet!sco!evanh From: evanh@sco.COM (Evan A.C. Hunt) Newsgroups: comp.society.futures Subject: Re: Electronic Newspapers Message-ID: <2907@viscous.sco.COM> Date: 6 May 89 04:16:46 GMT References: <8905031352.AA16555@mica.berkeley.edu> <174@marvin.moncam.co.uk> Reply-To: evanh@sco.COM (Evan A.C. Hunt) Organization: The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. Lines: 32 harry@moncam.co.uk (Jangling Neck Nipper): >Are we talking about news over the 'phone, or having the newspaper deliverer >chuck us a ROM thro' the letterbox? Until 'phone line speeds are comparable >to ethernet, it's just not going to be practical, is it? The average, 20 >page full size (ie, not tabloid - does it have a name?) newspaper must >require several magabytes, including pictures, and ROMs ain't that cheap >either, so what *are* we talking about here??? We can send TV signals around on cables, and that takes pretty impressive bandwidth--thirty pictures a second. I'm sure with some reasonable compaction algorithm you could download a newspaper from a TV channel in a few minutes, probably a lot less. So you set up a service on your cable system, on one of those thirty or forty available channels that I've never known a cable system to use, which, every few minutes, blasts out the latest news. When you want to read the news, you turn on your receiver, which waits for the next transmission on channel 90 to begin, and reads it in when it does. The system would probably have to transmit slower than it was capable of doing, though, because we wouldn't want it to go faster than the receiver's mass storage. How long does it take to write several megabytes on a hard disk? Two, three minutes, maybe? Then that's our lower limit on speed. Now the only problem is getting enough people to buy receivers to make it worth the cable company's time and money. -- Evan A.C. Hunt evanh@sco.COM The Santa Cruz Operation, Inc. uunet!sco!evanh (408) 425-7222 evanh%sco.COM@ucscc.ucsc.EDU