Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!indri!aplcen!haven!adm!smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@smoke.BRL.MIL (Doug Gwyn)
Newsgroups: comp.std.c
Subject: Re: Multiple typedefs
Message-ID: <10181@smoke.BRL.MIL>
Date: 1 May 89 04:29:38 GMT
References: <10167@smoke.BRL.MIL> <16.UUL1.3#5077@aussie.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 7

In article <16.UUL1.3#5077@aussie.UUCP> rex@aussie.UUCP (Rex Jaeschke) writes:
>Watch out though 'cos this is the solution for implementers.

Yeah, I debated with myself whether or not to put in the leading _
and decided that if I didn't somebody (you, I suppose) would post
a follow-up warning that implementers would need to use an _.
Sigh.