Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ames!ncar!tank!uwvax!umn-d-ub!umn-cs!dayton!joe From: joe@dayton.UUCP (Joseph P. Larson) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: UUdecode - Can someone post binary? Keywords: uudecode, binary Message-ID: <6522@dayton.UUCP> Date: 28 Apr 89 14:07:11 GMT References: <220@isctsse.UUCP> <101354@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <6967@bsu-cs.bsu.edu> Reply-To: joe@dayton.UUCP (Joseph P. Larson) Organization: Dayton-Hudson Dept. Store Co. Lines: 33 cfchiesa@bsu-cs.bsu.edu (Christopher Chiesa) writes: >page%rishathra@Sun.COM (Bob Page) writes: >> >> Somebody once told me there was a BASIC version of UUDECODE floating >> around. If you know of it, or know how to get it, please let me know >> so I can distribute it. >> >That's an interesting point, and one that I hadn't thought of before: I have >a BASIC implementation of UUdecode for an Atari 8-bit computer; it ought to >be possible to translate it into, say, AmigaBasic, and use that to bootstrap >yourself into UUdecode operation. Why are uuencode and uudecode considered such archane items? My C source code to uudecode is a whopping 184 lines, most of which is used to decide what the name of the output file is supposed to be. uuencode is 109. But every few months someone posts a message asking for versions that have been Ported to the Amiga, or whatever. Someone else needs a Pascal or a Basic version. And everyone talks about how there's one available from FTP or They heard about one somewhere. Granted, someone who doesn't know C very well may need to study the code for 10 minutes before they're going to figure out what it's doing. But the amount of time it would take to port these guys to other languages is probably less than the amount of time you spend looking for one that's already ported. Whatever. Just sign me- -Confused and Perplexed in Minneapolis. -- Life is a cabaret (old chum). UUCP: rutgers!dayton!joe (Picts 1-13 are DHDSC - Joe Larson/MIS 1060 ATT : (612) 375-3537 now ready.) 700 on the Mall, Mpls, Mn. 55402