Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!deimos.cis.ksu.edu!rutgers!rochester!udel!mmdf From: OHA101%URIACC.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu (F. Michael Theilig) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: 1.4 Hopes and Dreams Message-ID: <14556@louie.udel.EDU> Date: 3 May 89 12:45:29 GMT Sender: mmdf@udel.EDU Lines: 56 First off, I hope that this isn't too late. I have heared that an unnamed magazine has announced a date for 1.4. Anyways ... This is a list of things that I find importaint and would like to see corrected in a newer version of the operating system. If any of these have already been implemented, please educate me as so. But for now, here we go: This is something minor. The initial CLI (when you first boot the machine) is not full screen. People who use interlace or MoreRows know this. I can't immagine that this is hard to fix. Workbench ... Where shall we start ... How about being able to create a directory? makeing it faster? There is a lot of power not available to the Workbench user that should be. I suggest rewriting it entirely. Suggestions: Interlace selectable from a menu. Colors switchable from 4, 8, or 16 from a menu or preferences. Support more color workbench. The ability to view directorys by filename. The ability to utilize the devices (SER: PRT: etc) easily. There is a lot of talk about a 'common user interface'. I agree that this is needed, however, I'd hate to see AmigaDOS die. The machine should be able to be used fully from both environments. Workbench doesn't cut it. There is really too much to list even if I could think of it all. Now, I have heared that Workbench is in ROM. Seeing how big the LoadWb command is, I would immagine that it is also elsewhere. As there is some tightness problems in the 256k ROMs, get Workbench out of there! One final point (gee, this isn't as long as I thought it would be, I must have forgotten something ...). A lot of people anxious for a more perfect user interface, seem to be pointing at the Mac. While the Mac does have a complete, and powerfull user interface, I don't really care for it, and there is no reason that the Amiga can't develope one of it's own. I have seen many programs (Access! comes to mind) that have a great interface, while looking and acting little like a Mac. (After all, Apple might sue us! ;') That's about it for 1.4 from me. I really can't wait to see what is looks like. I have total faith in the Amiga community's ability to program and dispite the poor marketing of the machine, it is succeeding. Thank you for your ear. /*----------------------------------------------------------------- | Frederick M. Theilig OHA101 at URIACC.Bitnet | | Computer Science The University of Rhode Island at Little Rest | | | | Greetings from CastleVM ! | -----------------------------------------------------------------*/