Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!chad From: chad@cup.portal.com (Chad The-Walrus Netzer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: System Wars Message-ID: <18030@cup.portal.com> Date: 6 May 89 19:31:01 GMT References: <24036@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> <11550@well.UUCP> Distribution: na Organization: The Portal System (TM) Lines: 23 [Born to Blit] In a previous article (Leo 'Bols Ewhac' Schwab) writes: )In article <24036@agate.BERKELEY.EDU> korpela@bkyast.berkeley.edu writes: )>GEM and ST GEM: I haven't used ST GEM too much, but I assume its a lot like )>PC GEM. It's nice and fast because it doesn't try to do too much at once. ) If the PC version is fast, then something got lost in the ST )translation. ST windows are (IMHO) slow. Response to clicking on gadgets )is sluggish; I have to hold the button down for a rather long time for it to )hear me. Nothing was lost in the translation... PC versions of GEM are slow also... UNLESS, you have a High-speed, Power thrusting, Silicon afterburning machine, in which case it is at least adequate. And you are not mistraken because you DO have to hold down the button for almost half a second before the pointer will pick up an icon (this sluggishness occurs on menu selections too, sometimes) In any case, speed is obviously not it's purpose in life... (Maybe "Pain" is...) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Chad 'The_Walrus' Netzer -> AmigaManiac++ [Fancy quote omitted because all Portal users are immature teenagers who pick their noses and say, "Duh" to everyone...]