Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!iuvax!rutgers!apple!oliveb!amiga!cbmvax!jesup
From: jesup@cbmvax.UUCP (Randell Jesup)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: Re: LoadSeg() 1.4 Request
Message-ID: <6754@cbmvax.UUCP>
Date: 3 May 89 18:04:37 GMT
References: <8905012052.AA25549@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> <1688@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca>
Reply-To: jesup@cbmvax.UUCP (Randell Jesup)
Organization: Commodore Technology, West Chester, PA
Lines: 17

In article <1688@dciem.dciem.dnd.ca> chk@dretor.dciem.dnd.ca (C. Harald Koch) writes:
>In article <8905012052.AA25549@postgres.Berkeley.EDU> dillon@POSTGRES.BERKELEY.EDU (Matt Dillon) writes:
>> [... lots of stuff about LoadSeg() ...]
>>
>>	(8) re-write LoadSeg() in C ... This is extremely simple to do, and
>>	    implement all of the above of course.
>>
>So why don't you write it all anyway, and release it as a "replacement
>LoadSeg() function"? Amiga will probably then incorporate it (like your
>pipe) and in the mean time the Amiga programmers of the world will heap even
>more praise upon you!

	To avoid people spending time in redundant pursuits, LoadSeg already
has been rewritten by Commodore, in optimized assembler.

-- 
Randell Jesup, Commodore Engineering {uunet|rutgers|allegra}!cbmvax!jesup