Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!unmvax!pprg.unm.edu!hc!lll-winken!uunet!tektronix!psueea!psu-cs.cs.pdx.edu!bartonr
From: bartonr@psu-cs.cs.pdx.edu (Bob Barton)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech
Subject: ATOM
Message-ID: <1150@psueea.UUCP>
Date: 6 May 89 21:03:44 GMT
Sender: news@psueea.UUCP
Reply-To: bartonr@psu-cs.cs.pdx.edu (Bob Barton)
Organization: Dept. of Computer Science, Portland State University; Portland OR
Lines: 8

In article <247@medusa.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> mlelstv@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (Michael van Elst ) writes:
>
>The only thing that I want to point on is, that memory type information
>isn't placed in the hunk type fields BUT in the hunk size field.

  It does say that in the AmigaDOS 1.1 manual, but I don't think it's correct.
I have seen executables with hunks of type 400003EA (hunk_data_chip) and
haven't noticed any alteration of the hunk size.