Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!UCONNVM.BITNET!SEWALL From: SEWALL@UCONNVM.BITNET (Murph Sewall) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple Subject: Re: Murph Sewall Message-ID: <8905021019.aa14558@SMOKE.BRL.MIL> Date: 2 May 89 15:16:52 GMT References: Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Organization: The Internet Lines: 22 > I could have sworn that the message that did reach you was sent via: > crash!nosc!rutgers!uconnvm.bitnet!sewall , but when I tried to >reply >via that path to the msg you sent me, it bounced back. This is getting >really frustrating! Ain't gateways wonderful(?)! 8-( That IS a valid path; although you don't say where the bounce came from, I wouldn't be surprised if 'nosc' reported it as "unable to connect" with 'rutgers.' nosc has been experiencing some mail problems recently, but I got a node from Ted Medin over the weekend saying they *think* they have the difficulty fixed. Persevere :-) Murph Sewall Vaporware? ---> [Gary Larson returns 1/1/90] Prof. of Marketing Sewall@UConnVM.BITNET Business School sewall%uconnvm.bitnet@mitvma.mit.edu [INTERNET] U of Connecticut {psuvax1 or mcvax }!UCONNVM.BITNET!SEWALL [UUCP] (203) 486-5246 [FAX] (203) 486-2489 [PHONE] 41 49N 72 15W [ICBM] -+- I don't speak for my employer, though I frequently wish that I could (subject to change without notice; void where prohibited)