Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!purdue!haven!uvaarpa!hudson!bessel.acc.Virginia.EDU!gl8f
From: gl8f@bessel.acc.Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.atari.st
Subject: Please stop arguing about 80x86s and ATs in comp.sys.ATARI.ST!]
Message-ID: <1476@hudson.acc.virginia.edu>
Date: 8 May 89 16:05:32 GMT
References: <8905021217.AA08520@nh.cs.wm.edu> <98@sdcc10.ucsd.EDU> <537@TSfR.UUCP> <3944@tekcrl.LABS.TEK.COM>
Sender: news@hudson.acc.virginia.edu
Reply-To: gl8f@Virginia.EDU (Greg Lindahl)
Organization: Dept. of Astronomy, University of Virginia
Lines: 17

In article <3944@tekcrl.LABS.TEK.COM> danw@tekchips.LABS.TEK.COM (Daniel E. Wilson) writes:
>In article <537@TSfR.UUCP>, usenet@TSfR.UUCP (usenet) writes:
>> In article <103@sdcc10.ucsd.EDU> cs163afu@sdcc10.ucsd.edu.UUCP (Some call me...Tim) writes:
[ lots of conflicting information, none of it having anything to do
  with anything but IBM PC hardware, deleted. ]

Can this dicussion be continued in mail or in comp.sys.ibm.pc, where it
belongs? This newsgroup is for discussing the Atari ST. If you want to
talk about what the Norton SI rating of PC Ditto II is, that's appropriate.
But if you want to make a bunch of misinformed or informed postings about
the history of the processor in the original IBM PC AT, that isn't.

Thanks!

------
Greg Lindahl                |
gl8f@virginia.{edu,bitnet}  |   Veraj Programistoj ne uzas PASCAL-on