Xref: utzoo comp.sys.att:6312 comp.unix.questions:13185
Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ukma!rutgers!att!chinet!les
From: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att,comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: uucico hangs on the AT&T 6386
Message-ID: <8336@chinet.chi.il.us>
Date: 2 May 89 03:34:36 GMT
References: <1055@koko.CSUStan.EDU> <138@mslanpar> <828@nebulus.UUCP> <685@icus.islp.ny.us> <834@nebulus.UUCP>
Reply-To: les@chinet.chi.il.us (Leslie Mikesell)
Followup-To: comp.sys.att
Distribution: na
Organization: Chinet - Public Access Unix
Lines: 17

In article <834@nebulus.UUCP> root@nebulus.UUCP (Dennis S. Breckenridge) writes:

>Wrong!
> The CTC Gemini-10 has a driver developed by CTC Systems and the AT&T IPC-802
> has a driver written by AT&T Bell Labs. You can check the driver version by
> doing a displaypkg. AT&T 2.1 is the current release for IPC-802 and what 
> second of the year mod10 is the current CTC Systems Driver. Sooner or later
> someone will get right.

How about the driver for the serial port on the motherboard?   If flow
control is enabled, receiving an xoff from the remote will make the 
attached process unkillable even by root doing a kill -9.  If I didn't
know better I might think this stuff was written by a company that
*wanted* people to lock up their machines forever on long distance
calls.

Les Mikesell