Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!bionet!ames!purdue!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!rutgers!att!occrsh!uokmax!mcmiller
From: mcmiller@uokmax.UUCP (Michael C Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: Anyone recommend the DTK-1000 AT Clone ??
Keywords: DTK
Message-ID: <3075@uokmax.UUCP>
Date: 28 Apr 89 01:16:13 GMT
References: <4421@ncrcae.Columbia.NCR.COM> <21006@srcsip.UUCP>
Reply-To: mcmiller@uokmax.UUCP (Michael C Miller)
Distribution: na
Organization: University of Oklahoma, ECN
Lines: 20

In article <21006@srcsip.UUCP> rogers@orion.UUCP (Brynn Rogers) writes:
>Look out for older versions of the DTK BIOS. Be safe and Make sure they
>install a Phoenix or (whatever).  I have a Phoenix and it works great.
>Older versions of the DTK BIOS were especially buggy, so I stayed away
>from even their new version (which a knowledgable tech said was OK.)
>
Which versions.. I have several problems with some DTK equipment and
all indications point to the motherboard being faulty. 

If the BIOS is shot then I really could use info on what release numbers 
are sour. Any info, and I mean ANY , would be greatly appreciated..

Please respond soon as I will have to start yanking the motherboards for
replacement if I cant reach someother conclusion.

					sans

-- 
<  sans =>   mcmiller@uokmax.UUCP   or  mcmiller@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu  > 
< '..this one goes up to eleven. Its ONE louder.'                       >