Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!mtxinu!unisoft!hoptoad!peora!rtmvax!bilver!jwt!john
From: john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: OS/2 vs AmigaDOS
Message-ID: <274@jwt.UUCP>
Date: 30 Apr 89 07:48:07 GMT
References: <101907@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <274@tree.UUCP>
Reply-To: john@jwt.UUCP (John Temples)
Organization: John W. Temples, III -- Orlando, FL
Lines: 12

In article <101907@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> cmcmanis@sun.UUCP (Chuck McManis) writes:
>Also OS/2 is under a lot of time pressure and written nearly entirely in
>C rather than assembler. The combination has the same effect it has on

In article <274@tree.UUCP> stever@tree.UUCP (Steve Rudek) writes:
>I read just the other day in _Computer_Systems_News_ that Microsoft's OS
>for the 386 is being delayed because of the difficulty of converting    
>100,000+ lines of 286 assembly to 386 assembly.

So is OS/2 written in C or assembler?
-- 
John Temples - UUCP: {uiucuxc,hoptoad,petsd}!peora!rtmvax!bilver!jwt!john