Xref: utzoo comp.sys.ibm.pc:28273 comp.sys.amiga:33224 Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!husc6!ogccse!littlei!omepd!griff From: griff@intelob.intel.com (Richard Griffith) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc,comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: OS/2 vs AmigaDOS Message-ID: Date: 3 May 89 12:50:59 GMT References: <7953@killer.Dallas.TX.US> Sender: news@omepd.UUCP Organization: BiiN Information Systems, Hillsboro, Oregon Lines: 21 In-reply-to: elg@killer.Dallas.TX.US's message of 29 Apr 89 16:53:04 GMT In article <7953@killer.Dallas.TX.US> elg@killer.Dallas.TX.US (Eric Green) writes: >OS/2's problem is that it requires as much memory and disk space as >Unix, but without the portability advantages..... yet there's still >fools who are converting their programs for OS/2. For example, I hear >that the Autocad people are going to put out all future updates of >Autocad for OS/2, not for MS-DOS..... I wonder how much it would cost to get them to seriously consider an Amiga for Autocad ---? (No job's too tough, if the MONEY'$ enough!) - griff -- * Richard E. Griffith * Cyrus Hammerhand * * "griff" * Household of the Golden Wolf * * BiiN, Hillsboro Ore. * Dragons' Mist * * UUCP: ...[!uunet]!tektronix!biin!griff * An Tir * ************************************************************************** * These are MY opinions, if BiiN wanted them, They'd pay for `em! *