Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ukma!husc6!endor!siegel
From: siegel@endor.harvard.edu (Rich Siegel)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac
Subject: Re: Two Page Display systems, Radius Vs. Apple, any pros/cons/thoughts?
Keywords: Two Page Display
Message-ID: <1737@husc6.harvard.edu>
Date: 2 May 89 22:11:13 GMT
References: <29974@apple.Apple.COM> <5437@cs.utexas.edu>
Sender: news@husc6.harvard.edu
Reply-To: siegel@endor.UUCP (Rich Siegel)
Organization: Symantec/THINK Technologies, Bedford, MA
Lines: 39

In article <5437@cs.utexas.edu> knapp@cs.utexas.edu (Edgar Knapp) writes:

>fine. I shudder when I think of how badly the Radius software must be
>implemented, if they are unable to anticipate someone using another
>monitor together with theirs.

	The quality of Radius' software implementation has nothing to
do with their design principles, IMHO. The way I see it, they simply
forgot to handle a condition which, frankly, is not a common one.

	But far be it from me to read the minds of their programming
staff....

>Also, Radius was most uncooperative in resolving the issue. I will
>never even consider doing business with them again.

	I must defend Radius on the grounds that I've had the complete
opposite experiences with them. For all problems that I've encountered
with Radius software or hardware, I've received quick service, good
answers, and even some things that I hadn't expected, like free software
and ROM updates.

	The Radius products I use both at home and at work, and they 
are definitely worth getting.

		--Rich



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Rich Siegel
 Staff Software Developer
 Symantec Corporation, Language Products Group
 Internet: siegel@endor.harvard.edu
 UUCP: ..harvard!endor!siegel

 "She told me to make myself comfortable, so I pulled down my pants
 and sat in the pudding." -Emo Phillips
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~