Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!brunix!cs132085 From: cs132085@brunix (Gregory Brail) Newsgroups: comp.text.desktop Subject: Re: ventura Keywords: ventura,xt Message-ID: <5679@brunix.UUCP> Date: 5 May 89 03:57:05 GMT References: <629@eeg.UUCP> <2008@trantor.harris-atd.com> <3719@nunki.usc.edu> <8397@ihlpf.ATT.COM> <1312@lzfme.att.com> Sender: news@brunix.UUCP Reply-To: cs132085@cslab7e.UUCP (Gregory Brail) Distribution: usa Organization: Brown University Department of Computer Science Lines: 37 In article <1312@lzfme.att.com> jwi@lzfme.att.com (Jim Winer @ AT&T, Middletown, NJ) writes: > >300 x 300 dpi is quite adequate for printing if you use 12 point >type and larger, particularly in the highly legible type >famlies. I hate to sound like an old fuddy-duddy, but I've found that 300X300 dpi output looks noticably less clear than higher-resolution output when printed on any paper better than newsprint. Just look at the ads in the back of computer magazines -- it's pretty easy to tell which ones are printed on LaserWriters, even if they're well-designed and laid out. Needless to say, they usually aren't. On glossy paper, 300X300 dpi type just doesn't make it. On coarser-grade papers, it's sometimes OK, however. >The basic problem comes with the insistance of 10 point Times Roman >with a 6.5 inch justified line length. This was the standard used >with troff for typesetting. This is precisely why I hate troff. Even if you could use a different font easily, it would be OK. They don't call it "Times Romanoff" for nothing. >For those who are serious about reproduction, create your pages >oversize at about 129% (for 5-1/2by 8-1/2 pages) and then have them >reduced to 77% when the plates are made. This increases your >resolution to about 400 x 400 with virtually no cost. Excellent suggestion. You can even print at 200% and reduce by 50%. This looks even better. -Greg -------------------- Greg Brail st601396@brownvm.brown.edu (note: please use this address)