Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!bloom-beacon!usc!csun!csuna!abcscnge
From: abcscnge@csuna.csun.edu (Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions
Subject: Re: Daylight Savings Time, Leap Years, ctime, and date
Summary: Get REAL!!!!
Message-ID: <1937@csuna.csun.edu>
Date: 29 Apr 89 20:13:46 GMT
References: <1006@necis.UUCP> <489@lakart.UUCP> <1918@edison.GE.COM>
Reply-To: abcscnge@csuna.csun.edu (Scott Neugroschl)
Distribution: usa
Organization: CSU Northridge
Lines: 19

In article <1918@edison.GE.COM> rja@edison.GE.COM (rja) writes:
>
> From article <1006@necis.UUCP>, by adamm@necis.UUCP (Adam Moskowitz):
> >   2) Does anyone know if the new versions are less naive about determining
> >      leap years? It seems the current routines only use the "year % 4 ==0"
> >      rule.
> 
>Fixed by POSIX as I recall.  (POSIX == IEEE 1003.1 standard in this case).

While I like Unix as much as the NeXT guy (pun intended), does anyone in
this group REALLY believe that it will still be around in the year 2100?
Come on, guys, and get a clue!!!!!!!


-- 
Scott "The Pseudo-Hacker" Neugroschl
UUCP:  ...!sm.unisys.com!csun!csuna.csun.edu!abcscnge
-- unless explicitly stated above, this article not for use by rec.humor.funny
-- Disclaimers?  We don't need no stinking disclaimers!!!