Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cornell!batcomputer!rpi!rpi.edu!tale From: tale@pawl.rpi.edu (David C Lawrence) Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: Daylight Savings Time, Leap Years, ctime, and date Message-ID: Date: 1 May 89 02:58:28 GMT References: <1006@necis.UUCP> <489@lakart.UUCP> <1918@edison.GE.COM> <1937@csuna.csun.edu> <14353@duke.cs.duke.edu> Sender: usenet@rpi.edu Reply-To: tale@pawl.rpi.edu Distribution: usa Lines: 8 In-reply-to: khera@juliet.cs.duke.edu's message of 30 Apr 89 23:55:30 GMT In <14353@duke.cs.duke.edu> khera@juliet.cs.duke.edu (Vick Khera) writes: Vick> I believe that you meant the year 2000, not 2100 as not being a Vick> leap year. Check your leap-year equations again. The year 2000 most certainly will be a leap year as it is evenly divisible by 400. -- tale@rpitsmts.bitnet, tale%mts@itsgw.rpi.edu, tale@pawl.rpi.edu