Path: utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!shadooby!terminator.cc.umich.edu!wisner
From: wisner@terminator.cc.umich.edu (Bill Wisner)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: References line Re: Usenet Top-Level Domain Census
Message-ID: <247@shadooby.cc.umich.edu>
Date: 1 May 89 21:37:56 GMT
References: <164@ncis.tis.llnl.gov> <3164@looking.UUCP> <1428@stl.stc.co.uk>
Sender: usenet@shadooby.cc.umich.edu
Organization: Amnesia International
Lines: 8

(David Wright)
>Another 'sin' is bad Reply-to: lines.

There is no need to include a Reply-To line unless it differs from your
From line. Doing so is simply needless repetition. Because of this, you
may with to consider simply punting the rn code that generates Reply-To
lines (better yet, make Reply-To one of those headers that rn defaults to
empty, like Summary or Followup-To).