Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!ncar!husc6!yale!mfci!rodman
From: rodman@mfci.UUCP (Paul Rodman)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Criteria ... [really: are N designs better than 1?]
Message-ID: <838@m3.mfci.UUCP>
Date: 11 May 89 14:03:27 GMT
References: <2368@ogccse.ogc.edu> <1464@cfa.cfa.harvard.EDU> <141@dg.dg.com> <156@dg.dg.com> <658@pitstop.West.Sun.COM> <19088@winchester.mips.COM> <18154@cup.portal.com>
Sender: rodman@mfci.UUCP
Reply-To: rodman@mfci.UUCP (Paul Rodman)
Organization: Multiflow Computer Inc., Branford Ct. 06405
Lines: 10

In article <18154@cup.portal.com> bcase@cup.portal.com (Brian bcase Case) writes:

>brief stuff is one thing.  However, when I see terms like "price-performance"
>etc. in a comp.arch posting I look sideways at the content.
>

But remember that "factory-cost/performance" is quite to the point of comp.arch.

   Paul K. Rdman
   rodman@Multiflow.com