Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!mailrus!csd4.milw.wisc.edu!leah!bingvaxu!sunybcs!boulder!unicads!les
From: les@unicads.UUCP (Les Milash)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Criteria ... [really: are N designs better than 1?]
Message-ID: <451@unicads.UUCP>
Date: 17 May 89 15:36:44 GMT
References: <2368@ogccse.ogc.edu> <1464@cfa.cfa.harvard.EDU> <141@dg.dg.com> <156@dg.dg.com> <658@pitstop.West.Sun.COM> <19088@winchester.mips.COM> <169@dg.dg.com> <104996@sun.Eng.Sun.COM> <173@dg.dg.com> <105267@sun.Eng.Sun.COM>
Reply-To: les@unicads.UUCP (Les Milash)
Organization: Unicad  Boulder, CO
Lines: 9
Keywords:

In some article someone wrote:
>>  Actually, as I understand it, MIPS magazine had the name before MIPS (the
>>company) was created.  :)

i can't believe it's easier to get 2 generations of killer processors
fab'd & designed into products than it is to get volume 1 number 1 of 
some mag off the presses.

(but then again i can't believe that the american public went for bush/quayle.)